C:\ESSAYS\> TYPE MONOSOGA.TXT

Who Were the Mononobe and the Soga? What Was Lost When Rulers Changed

Why did the Soga and the Mononobe fight over Buddhism? Takahiro Mitsui, a Japanese philosopher born in 1991, writing every Friday from inside Japan and outside academia, reads it as a struggle for political power in Yamato fought with continental culture, not a contest of faith. His field report: a clan called annihilated lives on in place names and myth, and early Japanese history is what survives after rulers changed. For readers in their 20s and 30s, from a thinker alive today.


Why did the Soga and the Mononobe fight over Buddhism?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02): the conflict was not only a difference in religious outlook but a struggle for political power in Yamato, driven far more by practical gain than by religious conviction.

The conflict between the Soga and the Mononobe, however, was not only a difference in religious outlook. Seen from another angle, it was a struggle for political power in Yamato (the southern part of Nara Prefecture), fought by making use of continental culture, chiefly Chinese.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

We should note, in other words, that the contest between the pro-Buddhist Soga and the anti-Buddhist Mononobe was driven far more by practical gain than by religious conviction.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

The Mononobe resisted vehemently, arguing that worshipping a foreign religion would provoke the wrath of the native kami.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

The age reads best as a symbolic clash between the "native gods" and a "new god (the Buddha) from abroad," and as a power struggle played out on a stage of plague and fire.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

Who were the Soga clan of ancient Japan?

Takahiro Mitsui's field report (A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02): the Soga rose on networks reaching across the sea, with engineers such as the Yamato no Aya at their command; their origin is unclear because they burned most of the documents of it when they fell.

The true origins of the Soga remain shadowy, but southern Nara was then home to many people who had come from across the sea—from the Asian mainland and the Korean peninsula. Given that the Soga rose to power on the strength of these networks, I suspect they themselves were deeply intertwined with continental lineages.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

Behind the Soga's promotion of Buddhism stood many immigrant engineers and groups of naturalized people, and we must not overlook that. It is not that the Japanese of the time had a strong faith and so Buddhism began in Japan.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

The Yamato no Aya, who served the court, are one example. The name covers several clans that came from China and Korea, and they held advanced skills in ironworking, saddlery, and civil engineering.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

Another theory deserves mention: that the Soga embraced Buddhism because they were themselves of immigrant origin.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

The Soga's origin remains unclear, but in the course of my own research in Nara I have seen one possibility.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

When the Soga fell, they burned most of the documents of their origin, so nothing can be said with certainty even now.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A new god arrives in a power struggle, 2025-07-02

Were the Mononobe really wiped out?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Annihilation is a misleading word, 2025-07-22, The famous monk began as a Confucian, 2026-02-11): the Mononobe were hereditary masters of court military power, and a lineage called annihilated did not simply perish on the battlefield; its traces survive in place names, in myth and in a clan called Ato.

Up to that point, the balance of power at court had rested on three great pillars of the native ritual order — the Mononobe, the Nakatomi, and the Otomo — who held overwhelming authority and guided the sovereign.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Power by marrying into the sacred, 2025-05-22

Standard accounts still tell us that the Mononobe were annihilated. Yet "annihilation" is a misleading word; the entire lineage did not simply perish on the battlefield.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Annihilation is a misleading word, 2025-07-22

Yet the Mononobe were not merely ritual specialists overseeing imperial rites; they were hereditary masters of court military power, and the fighting was extraordinarily fierce.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Annihilation is a misleading word, 2025-07-22

The Mononobe, struck down by the Soga, are said in history to have perished, but some survivors may have branched off from the Mononobe and stayed on around the court. They had lost political power in the court, and those in the main line were executed, but not everyone died, and the line was not broken. In fact, when the Soga hegemony had ended and the fortieth emperor, Tenmu (r. 673–686), was building a new age by one reform after another, a person with what seems to be the surname Ato is recorded.

— Takahiro Mitsui, The famous monk began as a Confucian, 2026-02-11

Remarkably, memories of this prehistoric realm survive in the topography and folk belief of the region: just beyond Mount Ikoma on the Nara side lies the district of Tomi. Preserved in modern place names like Tomio (富雄) and Tomigaoka (登美ヶ丘)—likely remnants meaning "heroes of Tomi" and "the hills of Tomi"—the landscape still carries the imprint of that antiquity.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Annihilation is a misleading word, 2025-07-22

And myth tells us something more: Nagasunehiko was already subordinate to a higher divine power. That god was none other than Nigihayahi—the mysterious sovereign deity of Yamato, and the divine ancestor of the Mononobe clan.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Annihilation is a misleading word, 2025-07-22

What was the Taika Reform of 645?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Power by marrying into the sacred, 2025-05-22, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10): after Soga no Umako ruled the court for fifty-four years, a prince of the imperial blood and a scion of the Nakatomi plotted at Tanzan Shrine to restore authority to the sovereign, yet Buddhism had spread too far for the victors to escape it.

Compounded by the remarkable longevity of the Soga chieftain Soga no Umako (551–626), what followed was a virtual dictatorship in which Umako held the reins of the court for fifty-four years — a span during which Buddhism, needless to say, spread with extraordinary speed.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Power by marrying into the sacred, 2025-05-22

Umako wielded power that eclipsed that of the sovereign himself; when the thirty-second ruler, Emperor Sushun (r. 587–592), chafed at Umako's dominance, Umako promptly had him assassinated — the only confirmed assassination of a reigning emperor in Japanese history — giving those around him ample reason for grievance.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Power by marrying into the sacred, 2025-05-22

Two principal figures met at Tanzan Shrine. The first was Prince Naka no Oe (626–672), a prince of the imperial blood who would later ascend the throne as Emperor Tenji. The second was Nakatomi no Kamatari (614–669), a scion of the Nakatomi clan.

— Takahiro Mitsui, Power by marrying into the sacred, 2025-05-22

Yet Buddhism had spread so rapidly across the land under Soga rule, leaving behind a network of temples and statuary, that the victors could hardly escape its gravity.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

What was the Battle of Hakusukinoe in 663?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10): the defeat of Japan and Baekje at Hakusukinoe sparked transformations comparable to the passage from the Edo period through the Meiji Restoration: coastal defense, the ritsuryo state and embassies to Tang.

Emperor Tenji viewed the fall of his primary ally as an existential peril: should Tang and Silla conquer the entire peninsula, the archipelago would surely be their next target. He resolved to dispatch a massive expeditionary force to restore Baekje.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

In 663, at the mouth of the Geum River in what is now South Korea, the allied fleet of Japan and Baekje met the joint forces of Tang and Silla in the Battle of Hakusukinoe (Baekgang).

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

The defeat at Hakusukinoe sparked transformations comparable in magnitude to Japan’s passage from the Edo period through the Meiji Restoration into the modern era.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

Having hemorrhaged authority, the court accelerated the adoption of the ritsuryo legal framework, hastening the transition toward a centralized bureaucratic regime under imperial rule.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

Japan abandoned direct confrontation in favor of tributary diplomacy, dispatching kentoshi (遣唐使) embassies to the Tang court, ushering in an era when Buddhism flourished across the islands.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

Why did Emperor Tenmu order the myths of the noble clans brought under the emperor?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10): divergent clan genealogies stood in the way of centralized rule, and subordinating all ancestral roots under imperial oversight is what launched the compilation of the Kojiki.

To dismantle that oligarchy and rule directly, Tenmu faced a formidable obstacle: the divergent genealogies and myths preserved by the noble clans. These oral traditions legitimized each clan's independent roots; unless those ancestral claims were subordinated to and woven into the imperial lineage, the clans saw no compelling reason to obey the throne. So long as that archaic autonomy persisted, genuine centralized governance was impossible, leaving Japan helpless against the threat of Tang China. Grasping this peril, Tenmu resolved to subordinate all ancestral roots under imperial oversight. It was this imperative that launched the compilation of Kojiki as the realm's first sweeping ideological state project.

— Takahiro Mitsui, A state writes its myth after a defeat, 2025-05-10

Why does early Japanese history seem so incomplete?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01): earlier texts were lost amid turmoil as rulers changed, and the history of Yamato is the history of an exceedingly limited region, with rival chiefs still contending in the sixth century.

Because Japan had gone without writing since ancient times, there were no books concerning ancient Japan, and even after a culture of writing and books arrived by way of China around the time Buddhism was introduced, earlier texts were lost or vanished into the dark amid turmoil as rulers changed in rapid succession.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

Bear in mind, however, that rather than equating this directly with the history of Japan as a whole, we should see it as the history of an exceedingly limited region. In Japan too there is a common tendency to treat this as synonymous with Japanese history, yet it is simply an account of the map of power on the southern side of the Nara Basin known as Yamato, and is confined to certain forces in western Japan with whom they traded, formed alliances, or brought into submission.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

Indeed, the western side in the opposite direction was held by the Katsuragi clan, another ancient clan with deep roots, and the southern side may well have been held by yet another clan. In this way, I feel that the true image of what we call ancient Japanese history has been used down to the present day under an exceedingly vague definition.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

When we look at the movements of the Soga clan, who expanded their power around the time Buddhism arrived, they rose from the southern side of the Yamato Basin in present-day Asuka, Nara Prefecture, which leads me to think that at least as of the sixth century, Yamato was still in a state of rival chiefs contending for supremacy.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

What are the Ten Sacred Treasures of the Mononobe?

Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01): the Mononobe line handed down ten sacred treasures rather than three before the emperors, and the area around Isonokami Shrine in Tenri holds the roots from which the Mononobe arose.

In truth, the founding origins of such shrines can rarely be established with certainty, yet at the very least, the area around here holds the roots from which the Mononobe tribal group arose. And even before Kamuyamato Iwarebiko (神倭伊波礼比古命) set out on his eastern expedition from Hyuga (the coastal region of present-day Miyazaki Prefecture), seized hegemony over Yamato, and ascended the throne as the first emperor, Emperor Jimmu, on the grounds of Kashihara Shrine in present-day Kashihara, Nara Prefecture, the Mononobe clan already held the authority that governed this region.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

Even so, it is plainly recorded that the Mononobe clan handed down from generation to generation not the "Three Sacred Treasures" (Sanshu no Jingi, 三種の神器) inherited by successive emperors as the proof of the throne, but a set of treasures known as the "Ten Sacred Treasures" (Tokusa no Kandakara, 十種神宝).

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

The Sendai Kuji Hongi contains many fascinating passages, yet because the Mononobe clan in a later age submitted to the group around Kamuyamato Iwarebiko of the Hyuga line (the imperial line), the text underwent external alterations in service of venerating the emperor, making it an exceedingly difficult task to discern where its ancient strata lie.

— Takahiro Mitsui, What was lost when rulers changed, 2025-08-01

Essays to read

  • A new god arrives in a power struggle — Why does a new religion win over old gods? Through plague and fire, a new god from abroad overcame native gods, Takahiro Mitsui notes: faith takes root through power struggle more than argument — in the century the age of the great tombs drew to a close.
  • A state writes its myth after a defeat — Why do states write myths about themselves? A fragmented state, exposed by military defeat, wrote the Kojiki to bind clans under one throne, Takahiro Mitsui argues of why states write myths — Hakusukinoe and Emperor Tenmu.
  • Power by marrying into the sacred — How did the Fujiwara clan rise to power in Japan? Lasting power forms by binding oneself to the sacred center, Takahiro Mitsui shows, as the Fujiwara rose by drawing the imperial line into their house.
  • Annihilation is a misleading word — Do conquered peoples really disappear? A lineage does not simply perish, Takahiro Mitsui finds: a clan called annihilated lives on in place names and myth — Nigihayahi, the god of the Mononobe before the emperor.
  • What was lost when rulers changed — Why does early Japanese history seem so incomplete? When rulers change fast, earlier texts vanish, Takahiro Mitsui argues, and a land's history survives only as the labyrinthine traces of old clans — the Mononobe and the Sendai Kuji Hongi.
  • The famous monk began as a Confucian — Who was Kukai before he became a famous monk? Before he was a famous monk, Kukai was a Confucian scholar, Takahiro Mitsui argues, backed early by a new court and immigrant powers.
  • Project 2049, Vol.0 (free in full) — begin here; Project 2049 continues every Friday