How to Live in a World Without Answers

The two frameworks I mean are these. One is the premodern framework of "place, ritual and community," a world in which these gave people the meaning of living. The other is the modern framework of "labor, progress and career," a world in which these promised a future. … Because both frameworks have collapsed at the same time.

Seeing this, we see that we are not alienated from meaning. The very horizon on which meaning can arise is disappearing. … Meaning is not made by the individual subject. Meaning arises in a place, from the relations between people, between people and things, between things and things, and there must be a place for it to arise.

Because people once lived before they asked about meaning.

I came to understand this as I traveled across Japan for my research: for our ancestors meaning was not something to be asked about. It was embedded like air in the life of every day and went without saying. They had no need to ask. When morning came they went out to the fields, when the seasons turned they prepared the festival, when a person was born they celebrated and when one died they sent them off. No question of why was put into any of it, because living and the meaning of living were not divided.

The "meaning of life" thought of within the modern framework is bound to be shaped by the conditions of society: labor, progress, career. Now that these have been replaced and invalidated, asking about meaning within the same framework is fundamentally mistaken.

When you pause to catch your breath at the end of a demanding day, do you ever feel an inexplicable sense of absence, a desolate emptiness expanding in your chest? … It is a quiet, piercing suspicion: "Did I truly live this day?"

The suffering so many of us share today may stem from a greedy pursuit of efficiency: we have come to view the time that is our life as a series of obstacles to be processed, a relentless queue of tasks.

As a first step, we need first to admit that we are not in despair. We are only pretending to be. … From this standpoint I propose that the real problem is not dropping out but that the room in the world to build another framework beyond the drop has disappeared.

Out of an acute dread that there may be nothing ahead, vast numbers of people today are averting their eyes together from an impossible reality. The unspoken watchword has become an invisible totalitarianism: if everyone looks away, reality is not there. … Only those prepared to live alone can move ahead.

But if answers really are flooding the world, and we know so many correct ones, why are our hearts so unsteady and so brittle? … The system teaches that your inside is empty, incomplete and unreliable, so you must always take in new information from outside, borrow the words of someone with authority, and dress yourself in the fashionable ideas of the day. … This is at the root of the uniform spread of mental illness, especially among Gen Z. … The one truth I can state with conviction is this: "the answer is not outside."

Strangely, people around me and my friends have lately been falling into depression, one after another. … First, as a basic premise, every rule of the world we believed in has already changed. When the rules based on the world we believed in change, naturally those who lived trusting the old world must feel the pain of the age and the self drawing apart.

If you feel that however fast you run, you can never catch up with the future, or you feel a dizziness as though the world itself were liquefying, your senses are not broken. It is a sign that the operating system of the civilization you depend on is crying out.

To say it plainly, nothing is easier today than making an opinion or a claim extreme. … This wavering happens because we have lost our roots. … Argument without introspection is noise, and words without roots are no more than weapons.

But there is also the inner world, the last frontier for us, which opens out boundless and vast. … The more I live my days with that sense, the more keenly I feel that the greatest trait of the modern age is separation, and each day I keep thinking about how to break through it.

Why moderate knowledge? Because if you fill a capacity of one hundred to one hundred or beyond, the chance that you will think and act for yourself and so gain learning falls to zero. It means that the inner world of the learner loses its yohaku (余白).

To keep diving is simply to keep performing acts of dissolution day after day. Transcendence sets a goal, the single absolute summit, but the practice of dissolution has no end, because there is no goal to reach, no ideal, no guiding principle. … What remains is to keep diving for as long as you live, and the diving itself becomes life.

However deep you go, there is no goal and no point of arrival.

The only and last unexplored land left to us is the inner world and nothing else. Now that we have lost our places to drop into, this is the last one left, and it has not yet been destroyed by the modern framework. … If we train now to reach the inner world, then even when the modern framework advances, we will not be affected. This is the last freedom left to humankind, the only world in which spiritual place, ritual and community can be generated without limit.

It is the responsibility of those of us alive now toward the future. What I propose is to keep asking in a world without answers.

The key lies in the inner world. … To keep asking in a world without answers.

This will be the passport for diving into that inner world.