History Is Written by the Center: The Japan Sea Side, the East and the Villages It Never Reached
Why does the history I learned feel incomplete or one-sided? Takahiro Mitsui, a Japanese philosopher born in 1991, writing every Friday from inside Japan and outside academia, answers from his own fieldwork: what passes for Japanese history was recorded to justify and fortify the power of the central regime, so the Sea of Japan side, the east and the mountain villages were left unsaid. Not a complaint about the past: a way to read the chronicles against the places themselves, from a thinker alive today.
Why does the history I learned feel incomplete or one-sided?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (History is written by the center, 2025-08-12): what passes for Japanese history was largely recorded as a narrative to justify the power of the central regime, and taking it for a record of the whole archipelago makes the history of most of its lands invisible.
What passes for Japanese history has largely been recorded as a narrative to justify and fortify the power of the central regime, while outlying regions—save for those in direct vassalage or alliance—have been treated as little more than an afterthought.
Yet when we take such a record as a comprehensive account of the entire archipelago, we end up ignoring the histories of the vast majority of its lands. If we treat what was set down on paper as absolute, the real history of Japan remains invisible.
The problem was made all the more intractable because Japan originally possessed neither a script nor a culture of documentary records.
Was ancient Japan's main sea the Sea of Japan?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (History is written by the center, 2025-08-12): the archipelago first flourished along the Sea of Japan, not the Pacific coast of today, and any history drawn without a full view of that sea fails to convey ancient Japan.
Looking back, it was along the Sea of Japan, not the Pacific coast as today, that the archipelago first flourished.
Yet any history drawn without a full view of the Sea of Japan fails to convey the reality of ancient Japan itself.
To dismiss the Sea of Japan and interpret ancient Japan through a Pacific-centered lens alone is to profoundly distort reality.
Why did the Yamato court choose the Nara Basin?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (History is written by the center, 2025-08-12): the Sea of Japan was a corridor of exchange and a threshold of geopolitical tension, so a regime wary of continental invasion found its ideal ground in the sheltered basin of Yamato.
The Sea of Japan, by contrast, had been since antiquity a bustling corridor of exchange with the Asian continent and the Korean Peninsula—a hub of commerce, but also a threshold of geopolitical tension.
From the standpoint of self-preservation, the central regime was never inclined to idealize the Sea of Japan as its political heart. Instead, they found their ideal ground in ancient Yamato: a basin so sheltered that, in an era haunted by the prospect of continental invasion, it was virtually impenetrable.
Did the Emishi of Tohoku really submit to the Yamato court?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (History is written by the center, 2025-08-12): the Nihon Shoki's tales of Yamato Takeru's eastern campaign and of Abe no Hirafu's northern expedition were court portraits, while in reality many Emishi continued to resist and rebel.
Although heavily colored by later embellishment, it served as a symbolic tale meant to claim that imperial authority had reached Tohoku since ancient times.
As general, Hirafu commanded 180 warships, advancing northward along the Sea of Japan toward Akita and Tsugaru.
In reality, many Emishi continued to resist and rebel, in a recurring cycle of submission and defiance.
The capitulations depicted in the Nihon Shoki were idealized portraits of fragile truces and alliances, framed from the court’s self-serving vantage point to justify the rulers' authority.
Who is left out of official history, and where can their stories be found?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Villages the victors' history never reached, 2025-08-23): clans once close to the Yamato court lost out in power struggles and were erased from the chronicles, leaving their own quiet histories in the mountains of Shikoku, a side of ancient Japan that the history of the victors cannot explain.
Why did the ancestors of these communities choose to live tucked away in the deepest folds of the mountains, out of sight of the plains below?
Look further back into antiquity, and the vast basin of the Yoshino River, running from the foot of Mount Tsurugi out to the plains, was a crossroads for people who had come across the sea, a zone where groups of extraordinarily diverse origins overlapped. Why some of them climbed into such deep, forbidding mountains remains an open question, yet the descendants of ancient clans indispensable to Japanese history still live here today.
Once close to the Yamato court, those clans lost out in struggles for power and were erased from the official chronicles, leaving behind their own quiet histories in the mountains. History may well be written by the victors, as the saying goes — yet there is a side of ancient Japan that the history written by the victors of Yamato can never explain.
Why are Japanese mountain villages disappearing?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Villages the victors' history never reached, 2025-08-23): in the hamlets around Mount Tsurugi only a few elderly residents remain, countless villages will cease to be viable by around 2030, and when the last elders leave, the culture of the mountain ends on the spot.
Everyone knows that the young people who leave for the cities are never coming back, and an air of quiet resignation has settled over the mountains.
One man I spoke with today, now nearing ninety, told me with quiet sorrow that an area home to more than 6,500 people in the late 1950s now holds barely 400 — almost all of them old, their children gone to the cities for good, leaving no way to keep the village alive. Given the age of the residents, by the time 2030 arrives, countless villages across Japan will simply cease to be viable.
Yet the day they can no longer fend for themselves and have to move into a nursing home down in the valley, the culture of this mountain will end on the spot.
Were there ancient roads before human-made roads?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Nature makes the road before people do, 2025-07-25): the oldest road from Wakasa toward Yamato and Kyoto was formed by faults before people cut a road, it lies behind the choice of the Kyoto basin as the capital in 794, and a wing of the prosperity that supported Kyoto lay in Wakasa.
In fact, before people cut a road here, nature had already formed this route.
This route functioned as the main road for carrying Wakasa fish to Kyoto, an inland city that could not get fresh seafood, and in recent years it has become known as the "Mackerel Road" after Wakasa's famous mackerel. Long before that, the fault itself had formed this road. It lies behind the choice of the Kyoto basin as the capital in 794 as well. A wing of the prosperity that supported Kyoto then lay here, in Wakasa.
In the Heian period it was therefore called a miketsukuni (御食国), a "land of the imperial table," which sent seafood as tribute to the court in Kyoto and supported the "sea" of Kyoto's food supply.
What happens to the cultures and memories of small, forgotten peoples?
Takahiro Mitsui's thesis (Homogenization erases the neglected, 2025-09-13): the Jomon customs and the memory of the Hayato in Osumi have scarcely been investigated, the public occasions to inherit that memory have all but disappeared, and this is one of the lasting damages of modern homogenization.
Yet the Jomon of Osumi have scarcely been investigated, and deciphering their world remains an uphill task.
Deprived of the chance to be studied and retold, its culture is already slipping into oblivion. The living memory of the Hayato still breathes quietly beneath daily life in Osumi, yet the public occasions to inherit and voice it have all but disappeared.
It is one of the lasting damages of modern homogenization—a malady that touches not only Osumi, but places like Tohoku as well.
Essays to read
- History is written by the center — Why does the history I learned feel incomplete or one-sided? Takahiro Mitsui's thesis: histories set down by the center carry editorial motives and blind spots, and the neglected Sea of Japan side, seen through Abe no Hirafu's expedition, is one of them.
- Villages the victors' history never reached — Who is left out of the victors' history? Takahiro Mitsui finds clans erased from chronicles left quiet histories in mountain hamlets now vanishing — written in the mountains of Tokushima, where Heike legends and old faith remain.
- Nature makes the road before people do — Nature made the first roads, Takahiro Mitsui says, and the ancient sea tribes who traveled them left mysteries essential to Japan's history — and at Wakasahiko Shrine, whose god must not be exposed to sunlight, a trace of the rift between amatsukami and kunitsukami.
- Homogenization erases the neglected — What happens to the cultures and memories of small, forgotten peoples? Homogenization threatens to sink neglected Jomon customs in the south and the memory of the Hayato, Takahiro Mitsui warns — Tsukuyomi at Kushira and Takeminakata's alliance with a local chief.
- Japan seen from the sea — Why look at Japan from the sea? Takahiro Mitsui argues centering it on Yamato, Kyoto and Edo hides the movements of people across water.
- The crossroads history overlooked — Why was Hita an important town in Japanese history? The Chikugo river's crossroads, Hita among them, mattered before the emperors' history began, Takahiro Mitsui writes of overlooked places — the Izumo people's traces along the Chikugo River after the Transfer of the Land (kuniyuzuri).
- Project 2049, Vol.0 (free in full) — begin here; Project 2049 continues every Friday